A Future for the Family
A New Technology Agenda for the Right
Over two dozen conservative thought leaders have united around a bold new technology agenda for the 21st century. "A Future for the Family" lays out 10 principles to govern technology in service of human dignity.
Technology is not neutral. It either serves human flourishingโor undermines it. Too often, todayโs technology erodes the moral authority of parents, commodifies children, and outsources jobs that sustain families.
Here are the 10 principles we put forward to guide our governance of technology:
๐๐๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐. Technology should heal and mitigate chronic disease, not pursue radical life extension. We should palliate sufferingโnot artificially accelerate death.
๐๐ซ๐จ๐ญ๐๐๐ญ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ง'๐ฌ ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐๐ซ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐๐ง. Tech should support, not bypass, the female body. No renting wombs. No artificial reproduction that severs the link between marriage and procreation.
๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐จ๐๐ข๐๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐ก๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง ๐ฌ๐๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ. From violent pornography to AI sex bots, todayโs technology industry profits from dehumanization. We must protect human dignity from digital exploitation.
๐๐ข๐๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ก๐จ๐จ๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐ข๐ฉ ๐จ๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ง๐ฌ. Social media and smartphones exploit childhood development. We must hold Big Tech accountable and restore free play, books, and real-world learning.
๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐จ๐ง๐จ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. The business model of smart devices capitalizes on compulsive use and surveillance. Technology should serve productivity, not entrap users in compulsive loops.
R๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ฆ ๐๐๐ญ๐ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ and ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ. Americans should control their own data. No more surveillance capitalism. Digital platforms must empower users with transparency and choice.
๐๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ ๐ฅ๐จ๐๐๐ฅ and ๐๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐จ๐ง๐จ๐ฆ๐ฒ. Right-to-repair laws. Open-source software. No universal mandates that weaken communities. Technology should serve local actors, not distant power centers.
๐๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค. Technology should enhance, not replace, human labor. We must balance automation with job recovery to sustain family wages and dignified work.
๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ก๐จ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐จ๐ง๐จ๐ฆ๐ฒ. Home-based production, flexible work, and labor laws that support familiesโnot disrupt themโwill reinvigorate communities.
๐๐ก๐๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฃ๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฏ๐๐ญ๐ ๐ก๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง ๐๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. Space exploration. Stewardship of the natural world. Tech should expand the human spirit, not confine us to virtual substitutes.
This is a call to action. If conservatives donโt define the future of technology, others willโat the expense of the family. Letโs reclaim a technological order that serves human dignity. Read the full statement here. (The statement was co-authored with Michael Toscano, Jon Askonas, Brad Littlejohn, and Emma Waters).
Also, on Monday, my colleague and Brad Littlejohn had a piece out in The New Atlantis explaining in greater detail some of these principles, called โStop Hacking Humans.โ
We explain that technology promises shortcuts: more convenience, faster solutions, boundless choices. But often, these โhacksโ bypass our human nature. The result?
Loneliness
Addiction
Dependency
What do we mean by hacking? Hacks exploit desires, bypass natural functions, and promise reliefโoften at a cost. Hacking the human person leaves us worse off.
Social media rewires teensโ brains for dopamine, not real connection
AI and VR replace relationships with simulations
Medical shortcuts prioritize quick fixes over true healing
From porn to IVF to AI, weโve traded long-term flourishing for short-term fixes. Supplements have become substitutes. We need a better path: channeling technology toward healing, not hacking. Solutions like:
Reforming Section 230 to hold platforms accountable for their product design harms
Age-gating addictive content like pornography and social media
Prioritizing restorative medicine over quick-fix procedures
If we donโt govern technology, it will govern us. The stakes are high: our families, our humanity, our future. Technology must support the human person, not exploit us. Itโs time to say no to shortcuts that degrade and yes to solutions that heal.




On the surface, I think this is a good set of principles to put forward.
Iโd be really curious to see how you see this playing out in practice and not only in the governing of the models uses but how theyโre developed.
Thereโs a lot of complexity in weeds that often gets missed.
I also would love it if instead of creating silos around governance like the right or left, US or EU, we brought together diverse minds and perspectives to find the common ground. This is way to big of a risk to lose ground because weโre busy fighting over who wins.
Honestly, if framed properly, I think what you have here could be aligned across the political spectrum. I work with people from around the globe and all political positions. I consistently observe than when we dig in, thereโs far more common ground than is often credited.